Re:Bill Watterson’s refusal to license Calvin and Hobbes (2016)
by jltsiren on Saturday July 16, 2022 @09:36AM
(#32117923)
You were not supposed to try to break through, because that meant becoming part of the establishment. Doing cool things was what mattered. Success was tolerated when it arose organically, but it was not a positive thing in itself. People who were deliberately trying to be successful were branded mediocre and boring, because only mediocre and boring people wanted to be part of the establishment.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bill Watterson’s refusal to license Calvin and Hobbes (2016)
by simonh on Saturday July 16, 2022 @02:34PM
(#32120639)
Realistically, that was only ever an extreme view held by a small minority even in the alternative lifestyle and arts communities.
Re:Bill Watterson’s refusal to license Calvin and Hobbes (2016)
by jltsiren on Saturday July 16, 2022 @06:02PM
(#32122365)
I remember it more as the dominant left-wing ideology among university students, creative people and various subcultures. Extremists obviously had more extreme views, but some mild anarchism was mainstream.
Back then, people still believed in a better future, and the struggle for money was not as central as it is today. There was this belief that if everyone contributed something valuable and focused on things that were inherently important, there would be enough for everyone in the future.
People today are more militant and more focused on money, because they have lost hope.