News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bill Watterson’s refusal to license Calvin and Hobbes (2016) by coldtea on Saturday July 16, 2022 @07:13AM (#32116953)
>When Tony Hawk promoted crypto.com, I immediately regretted any kind of respect I ever had for that man. Does the younger generation really not care at all?

The younger generation follows and idolizes social media stars and "influencers" that sell out 24/7, in the cheapest, corniest (late night tv informercial style) ways possible...

Re:Bill Watterson’s refusal to license Calvin and Hobbes (2016) by lapinot on Saturday July 16, 2022 @08:56AM (#32117562)
Yeah.. hem tiktok youtube facebook hem instagram snapchat twitch.. This whole thing being discussed in the thread is not some abstract destiny, it's just that the social media lobby, ie the mass advertisement and marketing lobby is crushing everything on it's path since 20 years because they are now tech giants and have data crunching tech. It's not "the spirit of the time" or some other naturalization or whatever, there are active forces behind this (and i absolutely don't mean this in the "evil hidden goverment" way, these forces are fuzzy are multiple, but still, it's a school of thought that recognizes itself).
Re:Bill Watterson’s refusal to license Calvin and Hobbes (2016) by ghaff on Saturday July 16, 2022 @08:25AM (#32117351)
It's complicated but it feels like there is a huge aspect of personal branding/influencer/side hustle/etc. culture that's about making money any way you can and that to disdain it is to be "privileged."
Re:Bill Watterson’s refusal to license Calvin and Hobbes (2016) by ConceptJunkie on Monday July 18, 2022 @11:13AM (#32139301)
> social media stars and "influencers"

i.e., people who are based entirely on the "selling out" part without having created something to sell out in the first place.