News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bill Watterson’s refusal to license Calvin and Hobbes (2016) by mcv on Saturday July 16, 2022 @06:32AM (#32116726)
I've seen people with interesting and valuable YouTube channels suddenly pimp Raid Shadow Legends, which definitely cheapened their channel to me and made me lose some respect. I do understand it, but I'm not happy about it.
Re:Bill Watterson’s refusal to license Calvin and Hobbes (2016) by JKCalhoun on Saturday July 16, 2022 @08:20AM (#32117327)
Yeah, when a woodworking channel spends half a video "testing" some new product on their table saw, I begin to feel like I am being sold a bill of goods.
Re:Bill Watterson’s refusal to license Calvin and Hobbes (2016) by tzs on Saturday July 16, 2022 @09:54AM (#32118104)
How to you distinguish that from someone trying out a product to review it?
Re:Bill Watterson’s refusal to license Calvin and Hobbes (2016) by JKCalhoun on Saturday July 16, 2022 @10:07AM (#32118253)
It's a tough line to walk. For something like woodworking, I suppose I'm not looking for "a new product"?

Perhaps there should be separate channels in such a case: the wood-worker-reviewing-stuff channel and the making-things-from-wood channel.

Re:Bill Watterson’s refusal to license Calvin and Hobbes (2016) by ghaff on Saturday July 16, 2022 @10:13AM (#32118319)
It's one of those grey areas that comes down to the integrity of the channel owner. There are probably people who never find anything wrong with stuff they're sent to review and there are people who give honest reviews. Conflicts of interest are everywhere but it doesn't mean that a potential conflict of interest automatically translates into bias.