Re:Why wasn't the steam engine invented earlier? Part II
by Jensson on Friday July 15, 2022 @06:25AM
(#32106632)
They lacked the physics theory to make planes stable enough to carry a load, and nobody wants to experiment throwing themselves out over a cliff with prototype wings that will likely get them killed.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why wasn't the steam engine invented earlier? Part II
by zabzonk on Friday July 15, 2022 @06:36AM
(#32106713)
> nobody wants to experiment throwing themselves out over a cliff with prototype wings that will likely get them killed.
Actually, not a few people did exactly that! If they had used a scaled-up paper plane, they might have lived. Or think of a modern hang-glider, but made from bamboo and silk.
Re:Why wasn't the steam engine invented earlier? Part II
by magpi3 on Friday July 15, 2022 @07:28AM
(#32107011)
He wasn't testing wings, but you make me think of this poor, brave man.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Reichelt#Eiffel_Tower_ju...
Re:Why wasn't the steam engine invented earlier? Part II
by dham on Friday July 15, 2022 @07:57AM
(#32107178)
You didn't need to throw yourself off a cliff though. Just think of something like Jockey's Ridge.
Re:Why wasn't the steam engine invented earlier? Part II
by saalweachter on Friday July 15, 2022 @05:19PM
(#32112926)
I mean, an improvement, but that just means that you'll be killed when your wings half work (enough to lift you into the air high enough that the fall will kill you) rather than when your wings don't work at all.