The range of models is also much wider in terms of affordability. In Europe, we've reached the point where an EV is just another car, and even the cheaper ones have tons of clever bells and whistles like 360 cameras.
Now, it's true that they're the biggest single BEV _brand_ in Europe (and second-biggest in China), but that's... basically just a different marketing approach. VW Group has multiple constituent brands mostly selling largely the same thing (SEAT/SKODA/Scania/Cupra/VW/Audi); it's no skin off their nose if someone buys a VW id3 or a Cupra Born (these are the same thing).
But in absolute numbers it will not be easy to catch up, as batteries are a limiting factor.
Energy efficiency in modern EV brands also isn't very good, which requires putting more battery (and weight) into the car. (perhaps excluding Hyundai Ioniq-s)
Combined with fast scaling of the car production + high price of lithium batteries, this will limit how many cars can be produced or increase the car price for the consumer.
This may change if manufacturers will start improving efficiency or building battery factories for themselves. Which I think only VW is currently planning to do
https://eu-evs.com/marketShare/ALL/Groups/Line/All-time-by-Y...
So far in 2022 Tesla is fourth, just behind Hyundai (Hyundai's brands are Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis).
For the first 5 months of 2022 there were 500,000 BEVs sold in Europe with Tesla 3 and Y accounting for a little over 60,000. [1]
There is a tidal wave of competing offerings and Tesla will soon be on the sidelines.
[1]: https://insideevs.com/news/594688/europe-plugin-car-sales-ma...
That said...I would bet on koreans too.
But in itself, just making on of the best electric cars today would justify a valuation of 1/10 of what Tesla currently have.
I still admire Musk and Tesla for having started the electric revolution. But by 2025 (and maybe already are), they will just be one of many electric car manufacturers - somewhere in the middle of the pack.
The comment you were replying to definitely seemed quite a bit incoherent with their personal take on what hostile takeovers actually mean.