Re:Sufficient Decentralization for Social Networks
by omeze on Tuesday July 12, 2022 @06:21PM
(#32076469)
The point here is that self-hosting is _possible_. Most users are almost certainly going to just let a third party host their keys. But if keys are identity primitive at the protocol level, then the protocol prevents full centralized platform capture, similar to email interop.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sufficient Decentralization for Social Networks
by grishka on Tuesday July 12, 2022 @06:48PM
(#32076768)
The key being the identity still has the problem of not being changeable, no matter how you spin it.
Self-hosting is possible with ActivityPub as well, but without sacrificing the user-friendliness. I can already see someone saying "what do you mean I have to start a new account after my private key leaked".