a) being criminals who inflict various kinds of harm on others
b) working in jobs that would otherwise be taken by existing locals, who are now displaced onto benefits
c) working in jobs that would otherwise not be able to find employees, thus asserting downward pressure on wages/conditions
d) using those benefits which are available, such as (in the US) public schools, emergency departments, and sometimes state-specific benefits
e) using resources from a finite pool such as e.g land in a farming county, houses in a city that refuses to allow further development
Most of these arguments can be found when people are objecting to legal immigration
I'm not much of an "agitator on one of the sides". I can't afford to be an agitator, I might get deported. I'm just telling you what my life is like.