And for that in a hybrid setup you still have the option to walk to work. You can't expect every soul in an office to be able to afford a central place where you can walk to the office, it's simply not feasible. YMMV a lot, not sure why your anecdote should be taken as an argument, very few people have the privilege to afford a central location to live in, many more have to commute.
I have never seen an office like this, except on TV.
Sure, everyone happens to live right next to several good potential employers in their field, but instead choses to take a job further away because money.
Yeah that sounds nice, but it is more comfortable than your own home?
Not everyone lives in a luxury house.
Otherwise it's just a living space with a bed.
In that case I would urge one to get themselves a home rather than an office job with great perks. That's a better investment in my book. No, I don't mean buying, even a shared rented flat could be your home.
(Some of my colleagues returned to the office as soon as it was allowed, just to spend some time away from their families.)
> Also the lost time in travel - say 2 hours a day I can spend walking
My commute to the office was a 35 minute walk each way through a park and a historic city centre. Of course YMMV, but it rubs me the wrong way when people who decided to take on long commutes for better pay talk about how it's being taken away from them and everyone should feel the same way, when lots of people make the compromise of living in a city to not have those problems.