News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SSD will fail at 40k power-on hours (2021) by dredmorbius on Sunday July 10, 2022 @10:46PM (#32051613)
Re:SSD will fail at 40k power-on hours (2021) by solardev on Monday July 11, 2022 @01:50AM (#32052675)
Back then people still used Slashdot:

Wondering if it's real... https://m.slashdot.org/story/20680

Years later, it's a widespread phenomenon: https://m.slashdot.org/story/43312

It was affectionately called the "click of death".

Re:SSD will fail at 40k power-on hours (2021) by thrwyoilarticle on Monday July 11, 2022 @05:31AM (#32053977)
>But don't we all love them now because they support linux?

Ah, inventing an opinion to get angry about: some things never change.

Re:SSD will fail at 40k power-on hours (2021) by xyzzy_plugh on Sunday July 10, 2022 @10:56PM (#32051668)
Why would there be submissions? These drives predate HN.
Re:SSD will fail at 40k power-on hours (2021) by dredmorbius on Monday July 11, 2022 @12:18AM (#32052141)
HN occasionally discusses issues pre-dating itself.
Re:SSD will fail at 40k power-on hours (2021) by dredmorbius on Monday July 11, 2022 @02:30AM (#32052897)
... and the lifetime (deathtime?) award for the Deathstar only predated HN by a few months:

May 26, 2006: https://www.pcworld.com/article/535838/worst_products_ever.h...

October 9, 2006: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1

Memory would still have been reasonably green.

Re:SSD will fail at 40k power-on hours (2021) by vidarh on Monday July 11, 2022 @02:31AM (#32052904)
It does however come up in comments regularly. I know I've brought it up more than once, because I had a week long ordeal replacing all the drives in an array as they died one by one back in the day.