Re:Notice of termination of Twitter merger agreement
by gfody on Saturday July 09, 2022 @01:55AM
(#32032228)
bingo. if you want to assume bad faith why not go whole hog - Musk never intended to buy Twitter because he never believed they have what they claim to have, it's all a big scam involving inauthentic accounts and now the world knows it too
it probably couldn't technically be due diligence without the lawyers deadlocking on how to prove the authenticity of a twitter account
Re:Notice of termination of Twitter merger agreement
by saalweachter on Saturday July 09, 2022 @05:33AM
(#32033390)
So, what, he spent several billion dollars on ten percent of Twitter as part of his plan to tank the company?
Re:Notice of termination of Twitter merger agreement
by ethanbond on Saturday July 09, 2022 @07:15AM
(#32033916)
Which will obviously not even tank the company because clearly everyone sees what the product is and they see what the ad output is (pretty abysmal). So the big reveal is… nothing revelatory.
This theory doesn’t really make sense and is really covering for Musk’s incompetence or a deeper nefariousness: he needed a very public excuse to offload $8B of his TSLA stock without spooking the market, and he’s happy to pay a $1B+ fee to have been able to do that
Re:Notice of termination of Twitter merger agreement
by litmus on Saturday July 09, 2022 @08:23AM
(#32034389)
It's been stated multiple times in this thread that he can't walk away just by paying $1B.
If he wanted to only offload $8B TSLA stock and not buy the company, why put that possibility way more out of reach by waiving due dilligence and accepting the special performance clause?
Are we also to assume that he has managed to assemble the most abjectly incompetent team of lawyers in the world as well?
Honestly, waiving due-diligence is so sketchy that it has made me wonder from the start what his true endgame was. If he did want to buy the company, what did he gain by waiving his due-diligence rights?