Re:Notice of termination of Twitter merger agreement
by diob on Friday July 08, 2022 @11:15PM
(#32031209)
From what I've read, they're obligated to accept that sort of offer for their shareholders.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Notice of termination of Twitter merger agreement
by astrange on Saturday July 09, 2022 @12:19AM
(#32031623)
They're not obligated to; boards can pretty much do whatever they want.
However, Twitter's board doesn't use Twitter and doesn't actually seem to care about it at all, so they're not exactly going to claim to shareholders they can run it better than an offer that much above its current value.
Re:Notice of termination of Twitter merger agreement
by anticensor on Saturday July 09, 2022 @03:00PM
(#32038218)
> Twitter's board doesn't use Twitter
[citation needed]
Re:Notice of termination of Twitter merger agreement
by ergocoder on Saturday July 09, 2022 @02:18AM
(#32032381)
Aren't they obligated to negotiate for a higher price? At least, they should try.
Who the heck doesn't negotiate?
How is no negotiation the best strategy?
Re:Notice of termination of Twitter merger agreement
by gnulinux on Saturday July 09, 2022 @02:57AM
(#32032566)
Hmm this might be hard for you to believe but I've never negotiated in my life. I always accept asked price. Didn't realize this is not the norm. This is not in business context though.
Re:Notice of termination of Twitter merger agreement
by ergocoder on Saturday July 09, 2022 @07:34AM
(#32034041)
You are not running a $30b company.
At work, I was involved in a deal with a large company. The numbers are back and forth like 10 times with adds-on and discounts. It's just standard stuff.