Re:Nuclear turn green as EU parliament approves new taxonomy
by bloak on Thursday July 07, 2022 @11:10AM
(#32015093)
Coal: C + O2 -> CO2
Gas: CH4 + 2O2 -> CO2 + 2H2O
I don't know off hand exactly how many joules of energy (heat) are produced per mole in each case but it's not surprising that gas gives more joules per mole of CO2: it's a bit like you're burning hydrogen at the same time.
EDIT: It's relevant that O-H bonds are stronger than C-H bonds, presumably.
Re:Nuclear turn green as EU parliament approves new taxonomy
by 988747 on Thursday July 07, 2022 @12:36PM
(#32016174)
You also need to consider that H2O itself is also a greenhouse gas, much worse than CO2, although much easier to remove from atmosphere.
Re:Nuclear turn green as EU parliament approves new taxonomy
by nix23 on Friday July 08, 2022 @05:45AM
(#32024915)
>H2O
Water...
At a molecular level this doesn't make sense to me. The fundamental carbon cycle value proposition is to harvest energy released when a carbon atom (re)joins two oxygens. For the same energy, how would methane and coal produce different amounts of CO2?
That said, I can see how the oxygen reaction would be less efficient and create more byproducts (i.e. acid rain) using coal given its less refined nature. How methane would have a better energy to CO2 ratio doesn't seem to have an obvious mechanism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methane
Imagination, Physics, Fire & Trees - Richard Feynman (aka Trees grow from air, carbon cycle): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJLMysTpwhg