Not a violation. Decided by Supreme Court in 2021. Van Buren vs. United States. It was a big deal.
Violating TOS no; Gaining access beyond your authority maybe https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/07/court-violating-terms-...
Re:Taking action against scraping for hire
by CoastalCoder on Thursday July 07, 2022 @11:08AM
(#32015061)
I was assuming that in this case, a person's authority was specifically granted by the ToS.
I wondered if the interplay of those two concepts muddied the waters.
Re:Taking action against scraping for hire
by danaris on Thursday July 07, 2022 @09:57AM
(#32014159)
I don't have a source for this, but my recollection is that this has been successfully argued by a couple of companies—but then an appeals court found very firmly that it was not the case.
Essentially, having that be true would mean that any given website could create whole new classes of criminal behavior.
Re:Taking action against scraping for hire
by zinekeller on Thursday July 07, 2022 @10:03AM
(#32014240)
> having that be true would mean that any given website could create whole new classes of criminal behavior.
While this is true, reading the lawsuit it is clear that Meta is suing in civil court, so maybe they're trying to enforce their contract, especially their automated collection ToS (https://www.facebook.com/apps/site_scraping_tos_terms.php)?
Does violating a website's TOS meant your accessing it beyond your authority, making it a violation of the US's Computer Fraud and Abuse Act?