News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on What comes after Git. Parent comment

Re:What comes after Git by flir on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @09:49AM (#31988155)
There are a lot of people, even in this comment section, whose internal model of git is "it's a tree". Langauge like "branch" reinforces that model, and I don't think it does beginners any favours in the long run. Something something leaky abstractions maybe?

(Maybe you're right and I'm being a bit ivory tower here).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What comes after Git by avar on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @08:10PM (#31995287)
Even if you suppose that Git had some extreme UX overhaul to the point of renaming builtins like "branch", the existing names would still survive in the popular zeitgeist, as they predated Git.

So, I think it's an interesting thought experiment, but practically speaking a non-starter.

You'd never be able to fully migrate over, instead it would be another case of that xkcd about N standards.

[ Parent | on HN ]