Re:Amazon spending $465M on season 1 of The Lord of the Ring...
by anshumankmr on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @07:50AM
(#31987063)
Sean Bean wasn't an unknown. He wasn't a star either, but he was the villain in one of better Bond movies and also was in the first Lord of the Rings.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon spending $465M on season 1 of The Lord of the Ring...
by bigDinosaur on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @08:22AM
(#31987336)
Also the voice actor for the emperor's son in The Elder Scrolls: Oblivion. I'd say he was pretty well known and a bit of a star given that he was sought out for such roles and used in marketing, although not obscenely famous.
Re:Amazon spending $465M on season 1 of The Lord of the Ring...
by tonfreed on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @08:26AM
(#31987371)
He was in the Sharpe movies as well
Re:Amazon spending $465M on season 1 of The Lord of the Ring...
by Terretta on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @07:54AM
(#31987098)
Perhaps a gimmick — known name, killed off. Buzz!
Re:Amazon spending $465M on season 1 of The Lord of the Ring...
by alexpotato on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @08:11AM
(#31987236)
No perhaps.
Ned being killed off early is a key part of the "no one is safe in the game of thrones!" motif. Having a known actor and playing against type (nice guy when usually villain) just underscores the surprise.
There is a similar story about Gene Wilder in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. He first appears with a limp and then somersaults to show he's fine. The whole point of that scene is to have the audience think "I can never trust anything this guy says again".
Re:Amazon spending $465M on season 1 of The Lord of the Ring...
by Tao3300 on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @08:23AM
(#31987355)
> Having a known actor and playing against type (nice guy when usually villain) just underscores the surprise.
Normally you'd be right, except Sean Bean always dies.
Re:Amazon spending $465M on season 1 of The Lord of the Ring...
by ModernMech on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @08:55AM
(#31987619)
You’re right, he was killed off early in Equilibrium too!