Re:What comes after Git
by midenginedcoupe on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @05:31AM
(#31986156)
Well that's a different argument.
The irony is I use git for all my projects, too, due to the network effect. It's vastly easier to go with the flow rather than swim against the tide. But every time I have to wrestle with un-fucking git's state I find myself considering my life choices and how I got there :(
> But every time I have to wrestle with un-fucking git's state I find myself considering my life choices and how I got there :(
cough Fossil cough
Amen to that. I love Fossil for its simplicity and batteries included model. No external ticketing, wiki and documentation to manually keep in sync. Plus everything inside a single SQLite file makes everything easier.
I thought that mercurial was able to push/pull from a git remote.
You can use the hg-git extension for that:
Or there's sourcehut so you can use Hg. https://sr.ht
Re:What comes after Git
by laurentlbm on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @12:44PM
(#31990535)
It's not as “accessible” though: it's not free and is less user-friendly.
Re:What comes after Git
by tristan957 on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @05:54PM
(#31994220)
During the alpha, SourceHut is free to use, except for builds.sr.ht, which was abused by crypto script kiddies.
I think you can pay as low as 2 dollars a month to use SourceHut.
The big advantage of git is github and co, not git itself. By switching and using mercurial you lose all of the advantages of github too.