News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meta slashes hiring plans, girds for 'fierce' headwinds by robonerd on Friday July 01, 2022 @02:14PM (#31950461)
Managers have personal priorities and interests that may not align with the interests of the company. e.g. company doesn't want dead weight, but the manager does for any number of reasons. Maybe the manager really likes those people on a personal level, or maybe the dead weight have dirt on the manager, or maybe the dead weight are kept around as sacrificial material should the manager ever be forced to make cuts, or maybe the incentive structure in the company rewards managers for having more reports, etc.

So yes, expecting managers to put company interests before their own may actually be too hard.

Re:Meta slashes hiring plans, girds for 'fierce' headwinds by joshstrange on Friday July 01, 2022 @02:19PM (#31950543)
Or, in my specific situation, my manager (and the manger above them) were terrible at handling intrapersonal conflicts. They would just ignore it until it went away and hating confronting anyone about anything. At least one of them also "liked" the "dead wood" in question or had at least worked with them for a long time. I understand all of that. But at the end of the day, it was bad managers. Even if you somehow manage to clear the "dead wood" (good luck, they hold on longer that performing members in my experience) you are still stuck with bad managers and you'll be right back in the same place in little time.
Re:Meta slashes hiring plans, girds for 'fierce' headwinds by s17n on Monday July 04, 2022 @06:04PM (#31982207)
From the CEO's point of view, line managers and employees are basically an undifferentiated mass of potential dead wood. Getting managers to "do their jobs" is exactly the intention of a policy like this.