robonerd

> If a merchant should give silver to a trading agent for an investment venture, and he [the trading agent] incurs a loss on his journeys, he shall return silver to the merchant in the amount of the capital sum.

Not quite applicable, but kind of? If I give silver to Sony for a movie and Sony loses the rights to that movie, I want my damn silver back.

Seriously, I want to know. How did this happen to you? Was your common sense dazzled by math?

> In The Great Illusion, Angell's primary thesis was, in the words of historian James Joll, that "the economic cost of war was so great that no one could possibly hope to gain by starting a war the consequences of which would be so disastrous."[4] For that reason, a general European war was very unlikely to start, and if it did, it would not last long.

Published in 1909. Yeah..

Synthetic aperture radar is incredibly useful to the military [and generally.]

The TL;DW/TL;DR is that boost-phase missile defense, deemed infeasible years ago, may now be practical thanks to advances in technology (rockets, electronics and sensors, lasers, etc)

Of course the post-war aftermath would be deeply regrettable. But it always is.

In other applications I mostly avoid the ctrl-v/ctrl-c and use X's highlighting and middleclicking system instead. When those aren't available, I actually prefer context menu copy/paste entries to the CUA shortcuts.

> On May 6, 1986 Carmel City Council passed a resolution to enable a rewrite of the ordinance related to eating places and takeout food and make said ordinance more friendly toward ice cream parlors. The new language made eating establishments that “primarily serve frozen desserts” their own category

So they solved this inane takeout ordinance by exempting frozen desserts. I guess takeout hotdogs, pretzels, etc are still required to be sold with excessive packaging. Or perhaps a little paper dish for a hotdog is sufficient packaging? Could they have sold icecream cones if they put the cone into a paper sleeve?

Some of the things small towns see fit to regulate give an undue bad name to all government regulation.

Only a couple of years if you're taking GNU Emacs specifically. About one decade if you're talking about editor macros for TECO.

I don't care for the defaults either, but I also don't care for CUA, so if you had your way the defaults would be just as objectionable to me as they are now. Since you can't make everybody happy, I think the best way forward is to continue the status quo, so at least you won't be forcing configuration on users who were previously fine with the default.

It's simple: Don't tell other people what they did or didn't experience. If you don't understand that, then you aren't worth talking to.

I'm quite sure this process starts with me writing some config files on both of these computers. That's how it worked every other time I've tried these sort of things with Pulseaudio. These sort of tricks are possible for techies to do with Pulseaudio, but for the proverbial grandmother user they may as well not exist because the system as a whole certainly isn't going to make it easy.

Get fucking real, I have better things to do with my life than waste time ingratiating myself with the likes of pusleaudio devs. "Audio stopped working" describes hundreds if not thousands of pulseaudio bugs, do you really expect frustrated end users to drop everything else going on in their life and spend weeks learning the ropes of this shit? Get real.

That's a reoccurring pattern across Lennart software. He gets an idea of the way things should work, maybe from the spec or maybe just from his own subjective biases, and has his software expect things to work that way and fail when it doesn't. Every time, he'll say it's the other guys fault. Sometimes his software even fails unsafe and he still blames everybody else.

The '0day' username bug in systemd exemplifies this. Lennart decided that usernames beginning with numbers weren't valid, even though Linux permits it. Systemd was found to run service files with User=0day specified as root instead, not as the user 0day. To Lennart this was not a bug because in his subjective opinion the rest of the system was in error for permitting a username beginning with a number. Even if he were right that usernames beginning with numbers shouldn't be valid, the mere fact that they can occur is reason enough to code defensively around it. At the very least systemd could fail safe when it encounters such an 'invalid' username. But no, he thought there was nothing wrong with failing-to-root. It was everybody else's fault, of course.

https://lwn.net/Articles/727490/

https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6237#issuecomment-...

They broke their own user -> developer pipeline through years of deliberately alienating power users.

Just like today? How many people today own a telescope? It's a niche tool useful to some but irrelevant to most.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a94jraWNG-g