Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to cut emissions

Re:Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to cut emissions by spencerflem on Thursday June 30, 2022 @01:46PM (#31935948)

I dont think that is obvious at all, given the broad oversight over emissions given to the EPA.

Furthermore, I think looking at the recent decisions to uphold gerrymandered maps in Alabama and Louisiana should without a shadow of a doubt prove how partisan the court is.

And they can't claim to be "literalist" or "originalist" when deciding that border patrols duties are more important than the 4th ammendment

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to cut emissions by WalterBright on Thursday June 30, 2022 @02:04PM (#31936186)

Both parties engage in gerrymandering whenever they get the chance.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to cut emissions by spencerflem on Thursday June 30, 2022 @02:17PM (#31936346)

Uhh, yeah, but this is the Supreme Court who, if you look at the rest of this thread, people are claiming is "non partisan"

So if the supreme court is doing it then they're partisan QED

Also, please, one side is doing much more voter suppression than the other

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to cut emissions by deminature on Friday July 01, 2022 @03:18AM (#31943404)

Dems attempted to stop gerrymandering entirely by creating an independent districting body with the bill HR1, but were blocked from doing so.

[ Parent | on HN ]