News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to cut emissions by bashinator on Thursday June 30, 2022 @01:08PM (#31935465)
Why stop at “grow”? I don’t see why the federal government should have any say over in what chemicals I might want to purchase or manufacture.
Re:Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to cut emissions by TylerE on Thursday June 30, 2022 @01:18PM (#31935586)
There is a bit of a your fist/my face issue. I don’t want my neighbor operating a meth lab in his shed or building an atomic pile.
Re:Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to cut emissions by bashinator on Thursday June 30, 2022 @02:37PM (#31936649)
Devil's advocate: (I won't take on the atomic pile question since we're talking about consumables)

Operating a meth lab is dangerous _because_ it's illegal. If it were regulated and licensed, it would be no more dangerous than say operating an 18-wheel rig.

Re:Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to cut emissions by Red_Leaves_Flyy on Friday July 01, 2022 @08:15AM (#31945363)
Your comparison only holds if the rig is filled with the dangerous constituent chemicals, which are also regulated by government.
Re:Supreme Court limits EPA’s power to cut emissions by bashinator on Friday July 01, 2022 @12:31PM (#31948913)
Exactly. Regulated, not banned.