Re:Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
by matwood on Thursday June 30, 2022 @06:29AM
(#31930670)
The functionality of JIRA is great. It's the UI that feels slow and clunky.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
by square_usual on Thursday June 30, 2022 @06:49AM
(#31930792)
The functionality of Jira is great because it's basically turing complete at this point. A dedicated enough force of middle managers can warp it however they want to.
Re:Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
by matwood on Thursday June 30, 2022 @07:26AM
(#31931066)
In the worst case sure. It also lets a small team start easily and modify it as they grow.
In many ways it's like Excel. Everyone says making an Excel killer should be easy because people only use 10 features. Problem is, everyone is using a different 10 features.
Re:Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable
by TheRealDunkirk on Thursday June 30, 2022 @08:33AM
(#31931582)
As another comment rightly pointed out, Atlassian has some recession "insurance," because JIRA tends to be bought by big, slow companies. Big, slow companies implement JIRA with the same agility and cleverness as they do their AD implementation, which is to say: it tends to be a nightmare of permission complexity caused by internal political machinations. That winds up making the UI slow and clunky, and driving the end users crazy.