Every case where a woman/doctor was charged for actions in relation to illegal abortion. And every time those convictions were affirmed by lower courts.

That’s not what legal precedent is.

Otherwise anytime a law is passed, we’d consider it “overturning precedent”.

Precedent means that there is a long string of legal jurisprudence on a subject. Obviously roe/griswold created a new one, but it didn’t overturn/upend an existing one.