Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by notch656a on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @07:07PM
(#31914278)
Unenforceable without a registry of some sort. You'd never know if a check was ran for that firearm or not.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by laverya on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @08:56PM
(#31915178)
And indeed, it's when you mention the fact that UBCs require a gun registry to be enforceable that people really start opposing them. (The current background check system was passed with the compromise that it wouldn't be used to make a gun registry though the ATF, and in fact the ATF was not allowed to digitize records for exactly this reason. The ATF appears to have begun ignoring this deal in recent years, though)
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by giantg2 on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @07:51AM
(#31918880)
The ATF keeps the GAO quite busy. It's too bad the GAO has no real power on this and many other issues.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by pseudo0 on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @09:05PM
(#31915235)
This is a solved problem with modern cryptography. Governments just don't want to implement a cryptographic scheme like this, given the side-benefits of a registry for future confiscation, red-flagging, etc.