News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by txsoftwaredev on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @05:27PM (#31913232)
What is a gun show loophole? To purchase a firearm at a gun show you must go through a background check.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by alkaloid on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @05:52PM (#31913518)
In Texas private sellers can rent a booth at a gun show and sell without performing a NICS check.

https://www.thoughtco.com/gun-show-laws-by-state-721345

Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by txsoftwaredev on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @06:05PM (#31913686)
And the laws still apply to them. They are not allowed to sell to anyone not allowed to legally own a firearm, e.g. under 18, felon, out of state. If they do they are committing a crime.

And they will need an FFL if they make a business of selling privately.

Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by tomatotomato37 on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @07:02PM (#31914220)
The law also says they need to file taxes on that purchase, but what is required and what people actually do often differs
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by Clubber on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @11:58PM (#31916331)
>The law also says they need to file taxes on that purchase, but what is required and what people actually do often differs

I think you inadvertently hit on why people are opposed to further gun regulation. The people committing the crimes aren't gonna follow the law and it stands to only further burden regular citizens.

Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by hgsgm on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @12:27AM (#31916500)
There is more than one kind of regulation. Regulating people with an incentive to obey (professionals running businesses, like stores or shows) makes it harder for criminals to obtain guns they aren't allowed to possess.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by Clubber on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @10:00AM (#31920202)
>Regulating people with an incentive to obey (professionals running businesses, like stores or shows) makes it harder for criminals to obtain guns they aren't allowed to possess.

Can you give me an example of how this would work?

Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by Rebelgecko on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @09:52PM (#31915541)
Just to clarify, private sellers couldn't perform a NICS check even if they wanted to. There were some proposals to open the system up to regular people (kind of akin to my understanding of how Switzerland does BG checks), but they never passed.

Anyways, it's kind of a moot point in California because that's a felony here.

Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by txsoftwaredev on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @12:15PM (#31922222)
A private seller can utilize a NICS check with an FFL if they choose. It's up to the private seller.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by Rebelgecko on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @06:00PM (#31926220)
The fees from that are rather exorbitant. At least around me, most FFLs charge $100-$200 since they'd rather you buy from them directly (except for PPT transfers, where the cost is legally capped at like $50). IMO people should be able to run BG checks at cost.