Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by throwaway5752 on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @06:52PM
(#31914134)
It isn't. Unless someone was operating a crazy and expensive free guns charity, you are not "handing the gun to someone else". You are _reselling_ the gun to someone else who could not legally purchase or is avoiding a paper trail in order to commit a crime.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by bmelton on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @10:28PM
(#31915774)
Sometimes that's even a crime without the inability to legally purchase or avoid a paper trail - just lying about the recipient and engaging in a private sale can be criminal even if both parties are eligible for the firearm purchase
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by failTide on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @10:20PM
(#31915724)
I didn't mean to imply that there wouldn't be a payment - although it's not always the case.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by R0b0t1 on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @06:12PM
(#31913754)
It's a thoughtcrime and a terrible law because of it. There's a ton of these w.r.t. gun laws in the US. Say the wrong thing and you get ten, say something slightly different and you get zero.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by maxerickson on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @06:35PM
(#31913975)
We examine intent for homicide too.
It's more of a gray area when it's an intrafamilial transfer.