Re:NeRF: An eventual successor for deepfakes?
by astrange on Monday June 27, 2022 @01:51PM
(#31898118)
This discussion isn't useful because you're assuming people actually care if something is true before they "believe" it, which they don't, so they don't need evidence. "Believing" doesn't even mean people actually hold beliefs. It means they're willing to agree with something in public, and that's just tribal affiliation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NeRF: An eventual successor for deepfakes?
by fleetwoodsnack on Monday June 27, 2022 @02:01PM
(#31898247)
>you're assuming people actually care if something is true before they "believe" it, which they don't
This seems like an assumption too. I know there are instances like you’ve described but they’re not absolute nor universal and I accounted for that in my original comment.