Re:NeRF: An eventual successor for deepfakes?
by hutrdvnj on Monday June 27, 2022 @11:37AM
(#31896067)
I think it does, because while you obviously couldn't trust images since two decades or so, you could resort to video which wasn't easy to believably deep fake until recently. But if everything online could be a deep fake, how can you find out the truth?
Re:NeRF: An eventual successor for deepfakes?
by whimsicalism on Monday June 27, 2022 @12:00PM
(#31896443)
Videos can be faked too, it is just cheaper now.
Re:NeRF: An eventual successor for deepfakes?
by makapuf on Monday June 27, 2022 @03:50PM
(#31899840)
It's called special fx, is more than a century old (people are now aware it's fake but remember the word is that the train coming in la ciotat movie made people run out of the movie theatre).
Re:NeRF: An eventual successor for deepfakes?
by micromacrofoot on Monday June 27, 2022 @11:51AM
(#31896288)
Photos have been altered for much longer than 2 decades. Think of airbrushing models in magazines (used to be literal airbrushes painting over photos). This has had a serious impact on our perception of beauty and reality.
This has been the case for photos for almost 2 decades. The fact that you can now do it with video or audio doesn't change that much IMO.