News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to set junior employees up for success in remote by bmitc on Monday June 27, 2022 @09:59AM (#31894678)
> I think anyone who can’t work well remote, on average, will not be your top performers anyway.

I don’t think that’s the case at all. One could say a similar thing in that it enables the worst employees who can drag down so-called top performers. But I don’t like any of these framings.

I personally prefer working in the office. I’m more productive, focused, and able to check in with someone or go grab them and show them an issue I’m having. I’m able to attend talks, have discussions, etc., which get me going on certain ideas. I am a person that doesn’t work well in ambiguity. I like to have a plan discussed and agreed upon. I find this is much harder remotely, for reasons both known and unknown.

Very few deep conversations happen over Slack. I miss some of the deep conversations I used to have with fellow coworkers on slower days. You are also very limited to the type of work you can do. Basically any job requiring hardware interaction requires you to be in office, either by natural constraints or policies.

But I am also like the commenter above. It will be really hard to give up remote work. The convenience of not having to commute, dress a certain way, have my own food in my own kitchen, etc. are all massive perks. At some point, I may choose to go back into the office, but I’m going to do the remote thing for a while. Especially now that gas is insane.

Re:How to set junior employees up for success in remote by bumby on Monday June 27, 2022 @11:23AM (#31895846)
>I’m more productive, focused, and able to check in with someone or go grab them and show them an issue I’m having.

I think there's an important distinction here. It may be more productive for you but not necessarily for the team. You grabbing another employee may increase your productivity but subvert theirs. Anecdotally, my personal productivity goes way up when I work remote because I don't have all the "drive-by" questions that erode my focused work time. Whether or not that makes the team more or less productive may be a factor team dynamics and contributions.

Re:How to set junior employees up for success in remote by mgfist on Monday June 27, 2022 @11:51AM (#31896285)
At the same time, being able to maintain productivity while handling questions is a skill in of its own. I work on a team building/maintaining internal tools/infra and a large part of my job is interfacing with other teams and maintaining productivity on my own work at the same time is a big part of my responsibility.

So it cuts both ways.

Re:How to set junior employees up for success in remote by bmitc on Monday June 27, 2022 @03:39PM (#31899707)
I don't think that's a distinction, and it definitely isn't one way because the you here will also be interrupting the team. All this gets into team dynamics, which can't possibly be whittled down to such small interactions.

Then there's this somewhat weird obsession with people supposedly being unable to perform their job without 8 hours of uninterrupted solo time. The work day isn't supposed to just be each person working solo trying to accomplish as much as possible. Interacting with the team is being productive. Extremes in either direction are likely not productive.

Re:How to set junior employees up for success in remote by bumby on Monday June 27, 2022 @04:22PM (#31900256)
I agree that team interaction can be productive. (I might even be a bit cynical in saying that most team interaction is not, but that might be a digression). I think the distinction is in how the work culture manages those interactions. My previous job wanted open-door policies; what that turned into was a poorly managed ad-hoc set of interactions. Open door interaction tended to foster unproductive venting and it can become like corralling cats to refocus that energy into solving problems. That may be fine for a supervisor; it's probably not the best use of time for front line production person.

I think I may disagree about the "somewhat weird obsession" with uninterrupted work. (I'm assuming your '8 hours' was hyperbole). The research seems pretty clear that interruptions are more detrimental to highly focused work. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect certain blocks of uninterrupted time if the type of work requires it, but that shouldn't be conflated to someone expected to simply be left alone all day.