Good quote. For me what distinguishes the film and makes it better than the original story is exactly the elevation of the replicants into fully sentient beings. Batty started out as a grifter in the original and became the center of the story in Ridley Scott's film.
I was surprised that the question of sentience and what it means to be a human was actually less pronounced in the original story than in the film. I would have expected something more challenging (if that's the right word) from Dick.
Maybe androids in Electric Sheep have almost a Capgras Delusion quality, especially in the scene in the fake police station. They seem human but they're lacking an essential emotional quality that makes them 'real.'
Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40
by JohnJamesRambo on Sunday June 26, 2022 @10:12PM
(#31889920)
>they are cold, they are selfish, they are heartless, they are completely self-centered, they have no empathy, they don't care about what happens to other creatures
Are we sure that there aren’t a lot of replicants walking around already?
Describe in single words.
Only the good things that come into your mind.
About your mother.
Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40
by Der_Einzige on Monday June 27, 2022 @04:48AM
(#31892044)
No one has any ability to ontologically confirm anything about themselves, no not even the cogito.
In fact, blade runner I claim is a movie whose entire message is trying to undo the philosophical cuckerey that Descartes unleashed upon us all
Some political currents would wear those adjectives as a badge of honor.
Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40
by LegitShady on Sunday June 26, 2022 @10:09PM
(#31889903)
oof. niw i have to reread the book and watch the movie again to figure out the story from this narrative perspective.
-- Philip K. Dick, interview with Paul M. Sammon (https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=3d7XMnmPgUk starting at 19:10)