News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40 by kirevmaco on Sunday June 26, 2022 @08:56PM (#31889530)
"The main difference between what Ridley views this all in terms of and what I view it all in terms of is as follows. To me, the replicants (or androids, if you will) are deplorable because [inaudible] they are cold, they are selfish, they are heartless, they are completely self-centered, they have no empathy, they don't care about what happens to other creatures, and to me this is essentially a less-than-human entity for that reason. Now, Ridley said that he regarded them as supermen who couldn't fly. He said they are smarter than humans, they are stronger than humans, and they have faster reflexes than humans. Well, then I said 'well, gee Ridley, I mean, holy smokes, uh, golly,' and that was about all I could think of to say, you know. That's rather a great divergence, you see: we've gone from somebody who is a simulation of the authentic human to somebody who is literally superior to the authentic human. So we've now flipped all the cards on the table, you see, when we do that: in other words, all the cards that were up are now down and all the ones that were down are now up. And I was at a loss at that point, you know, to respond, I mean. I said, 'okay, now the theme of the book is that Rick Deckard is dehumanized in his job of tracking down the replicants and killing them, that in other words he winds up essentially like they are.' And Ridley said that he regarded that as an intellectual idea and he was not interested in making an esoteric film."

-- Philip K. Dick, interview with Paul M. Sammon (https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=3d7XMnmPgUk starting at 19:10)

Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40 by hodgesrm on Sunday June 26, 2022 @11:08PM (#31890193)
Good quote. For me what distinguishes the film and makes it better than the original story is exactly the elevation of the replicants into fully sentient beings. Batty started out as a grifter in the original and became the center of the story in Ridley Scott's film.
Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40 by tralarpa on Monday June 27, 2022 @04:27AM (#31891932)
I was surprised that the question of sentience and what it means to be a human was actually less pronounced in the original story than in the film. I would have expected something more challenging (if that's the right word) from Dick.
Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40 by EamonnMR on Monday June 27, 2022 @08:24AM (#31893548)
Maybe androids in Electric Sheep have almost a Capgras Delusion quality, especially in the scene in the fake police station. They seem human but they're lacking an essential emotional quality that makes them 'real.'
Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40 by JohnJamesRambo on Sunday June 26, 2022 @10:12PM (#31889920)
>they are cold, they are selfish, they are heartless, they are completely self-centered, they have no empathy, they don't care about what happens to other creatures

Are we sure that there aren’t a lot of replicants walking around already?

Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40 by Krasnol on Monday June 27, 2022 @01:33AM (#31890902)
Describe in single words.

Only the good things that come into your mind.

About your mother.

Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40 by Der_Einzige on Monday June 27, 2022 @04:48AM (#31892044)
No one has any ability to ontologically confirm anything about themselves, no not even the cogito.

In fact, blade runner I claim is a movie whose entire message is trying to undo the philosophical cuckerey that Descartes unleashed upon us all

Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40 by lbrito on Monday June 27, 2022 @02:26AM (#31891241)
Some political currents would wear those adjectives as a badge of honor.
Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40 by LegitShady on Sunday June 26, 2022 @10:09PM (#31889903)
oof. niw i have to reread the book and watch the movie again to figure out the story from this narrative perspective.
Re:‘Blade Runner’ at 40 by high_5 on Monday June 27, 2022 @03:00AM (#31891426)
Wow, this pretty much sums the modern post(trans?)-human worldview. Old world meets the new world.