News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DevOps is a failure by rco8786 on Sunday June 26, 2022 @05:29PM (#31888187)
The fun part is that the 2005 architecture is still plenty sufficient for 99% of deployments but everybody architects for 100x the scale they actually need.
Re:DevOps is a failure by tech_tuna on Sunday June 26, 2022 @05:31PM (#31888201)
This is a good point, but I'd say that's just the ops version of premature optimization.
Re:DevOps is a failure by int_19h on Monday June 27, 2022 @11:56AM (#31896364)
No, it's the ops version of premature abstraction - when devs build a whole extensible framework around a simple use case just because "requirements might change later" (which 90% of the time they never do, so on average the work is wasted much more often than not).
Re:DevOps is a failure by tech_tuna on Monday June 27, 2022 @04:23PM (#31900275)
I mean yes. . . premature abstraction driven by premature optimization. Or more simply, solving a problem you don't have now, and might not ever have.

Everyone talks FAANG scale on day 1. It's common and absurd.

Re:DevOps is a failure by bottled_poe on Sunday June 26, 2022 @07:31PM (#31889096)
Usually because most business say they need highly available, scalable infra from day 1.
Re:DevOps is a failure by rco8786 on Monday June 27, 2022 @07:54AM (#31893270)
I typically see it happen in the other direction myself. Business folks describe the problem/product and engineering team says “oh yea we can do that, we’ll need K8s” when they do not, in fact, need K8s