Show HN: A tiny and fast reactive observables library via functions

Re:Show HN: A tiny and fast reactive observables library via... by leeoniya on Sunday June 26, 2022 @11:21AM (#31884796)

  $a(); // read
  $a.set(20); // write (1)
  $a.update((prev) => prev + 10); // write

why not $a(20) and $a(prev => prev + 10)?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: A tiny and fast reactive observables library via... by fabiospampinato on Sunday June 26, 2022 @11:34AM (#31884908)

It may be as a safety measure, it's much less likely to misuse the setter if it's divided into two different functions. If it's just one function you need to constantly ask yourself "wait, am I setting a function or not?", unless you always want to write `$a(() => value)`, which would be pretty ugly.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: A tiny and fast reactive observables library via... by rahim_alwer on Sunday June 26, 2022 @08:31PM (#31889405)

I started with that but then I thought about what if a callback or some other function is stored as an observable (i.e., like `useCallback`). Also, as fabiospampinato mentioned it's a cleaner seperation of get/set which makes it much easier to differentiate at a quick glace. You can't easily mess it up. I'm still debating whether to achieve what you're after. Maybe I have something mentally twisted and it's easier than I think.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: A tiny and fast reactive observables library via... by MH15 on Sunday June 26, 2022 @11:29AM (#31884865)

I agree, this would make it a lot cleaner.

[ Parent | on HN ]