This literally was about the law. Ruth Ginsberg held that Roe v. Wade as a bad decision.
https://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsbur...
> Ruth Ginsberg held that Roe v. Wade as a bad decision.
This is a very misleading reading of that critique.
Ginsburg would've preferred the right to abortion be established a) explicitly a right of women, not a right of doctors to practice and b) via many incremental decisions, making reversal harder.
Practical critique; not "bad law", but "not secure enough to trust". As the recent decision demonstrates quite effectively.
Laws are the result of politics. I think it doesn’t make sense to say you can interpret/reason about laws in a non political way.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade
by zeroonetwothree on Friday June 24, 2022 @11:51AM
(#31864148)
You must be new
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade
by GekkePrutser on Friday June 24, 2022 @12:06PM
(#31864490)
Not new. Just naive.
It should be about the law, not about politics. They're supposed to put that stuff aside when they take a legal office. Trias politica and all.