Re:Microsoft Donated Money to Gnome: Remember How They Attac...
by phendrenad2 on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @12:49PM
(#31826132)
The question is why Microsoft is still viewed as anti-FOSS while Google and Facebook are viewed as pro-FOSS. Yes, your answer explains why some people might view ALL corporations as somewhat anti-FOSS. But it doesn't explain the discrepancy.
Re:Microsoft Donated Money to Gnome: Remember How They Attac...
by car_analogy on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @01:35PM
(#31826780)
Who are the idiots that view Google and Facebook as pro-FOSS? Did they somehow miss how Google is locking more and more OS functionality behind the Play store? Or Facebook's locked-tight Occulus?
Re:Microsoft Donated Money to Gnome: Remember How They Attac...
by jamesgeck0 on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @04:06PM
(#31828517)
Google is pro-whatever-is-most-profitable-for-Google. Sometimes this leads to pro-FOSS behavior (they’re consistently among the top contributors to Linux), sometimes not.
IMO the right way to deal with that is to reject the instinct of considering a corporation to be a person, just rationally look at whether their recent actions, look for potential conflicts of interest, and make sure any deals are guaranteed to be in in your interest.
For instance, Microsoft has been known in the past for screwing people over in creative ways. Famously they screwed over Spyglass by buying the code that became IE with a royalty deal, and then giving it out for free, ensuring that Spyglass got percentages of $0, which it seems they definitely didn't expect. So there it would make perfect sense to take a look at any deals that could be subverted creatively with a very critical eye.
On the other hand if they just give you a donation because they want PR or some such with no strings attached, then there's unlikely to be a problem.