News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sshfs Is Orphaned by Filligree on Monday June 20, 2022 @01:20PM (#31812933)
A (better?) alternative to sshfs is Syncthing, which works somewhat like a self-hosted Dropbox; it automatically synchronizes a subtree between computers. I've used it for years, with no problems at all. Maybe it won't handle concurrent edits to the same file well, but that's not something I do.

Meanwhile, the hung mount problem in sshfs can be more or less fixed by giving it the right mount options; perhaps something along the lines of https://github.com/Baughn/machine-config/blob/041e2151dffd8e... will be helpful. Unfortunately these aren't the default.

Re:Sshfs Is Orphaned by ASalazarMX on Monday June 20, 2022 @01:59PM (#31813425)
I use both, and while SyncThing is beautiful, it doesn't cover the use cases of sshfs, where you don't even need to install anything. I'm not going to install SyncThing on a server when I just want to patch a python file or copy some log archives.
Re:Sshfs Is Orphaned by dTal on Monday June 20, 2022 @02:45PM (#31814030)
Additionally, there's a wide semantic gap between "make the remote tree appear local" and "make a local copy of the entire remote tree".
Re:Sshfs Is Orphaned by grepfru_it on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @01:52AM (#31820369)
Why wouldn’t you just.. scp?
Re:Sshfs Is Orphaned by ASalazarMX on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @11:26AM (#31825018)
I don't know. How faster can scp make this workflow?

1. Open the terminal and mount sshfs.

2. Open Dolphin and Ctrl+Click 10 files among tens.

3. Cut, paste locally.

4. Unmount sshfs.

Re:Sshfs Is Orphaned by bityard on Monday June 20, 2022 @05:38PM (#31816360)
SSHFS and Syncthing are so different from each other, almost the only thing they have in common is that they talk on a network.

Very different tools for very different use cases.

Re:Sshfs Is Orphaned by Filligree on Wednesday June 22, 2022 @11:05AM (#31836961)
True. I was addressing both of the GP's use cases.