If an patient who is an outlier exhibits an extreme habit related to the affected cancerous organ, it seems advisable to take note even if it is possible there are undiscovered more serious contributing factors.
That being said, did you happen to know what ingredients were in play, since he was using the same product for ~>20 years it sounds like, maybe the carcinogen landscape was much more under researched that long ago? I mean leaded gas was still sold in the US 'til 96 -- even though theres just so much evidence of it being harmful to the nth degree.
Many available common mouthwash still contain alcohol. Alcohol's causal effect on oral cancer is rarely disputed in medical circles.
If ample clinical studies are absent, science does in fact rely on reason time to time in the interim.
>And why pray tell, should I disregard cancer specialist
Not doing such a thing, your words were directly "someone I know who doesn't smoke or drink and was sub-40 years old got diagnosed with tongue cancer." -- which is different from your words here where you link a study -- and I appreciate you for doing.
doesn't cut it for me. someone I know who doesn't smoke or drink and was sub-40 years old got diagnosed with tongue cancer. Cancer specialists were miffed at the cause. The only thing that stood out: he was a meticulous user of mouthwash 3x a day since he was a teenager.