Re:Breaking our Latin-1 assumptions (2017)
by DiggyJohnson on Sunday June 19, 2022 @08:28PM
(#31804932)
We still disagree, but I appreciate your reply and it is indeed logically consistent. Thanks for the explanation.
(This is a different part of the guidelines than "respond to the strongest plausible interpretation" BTW: the comment very explicitly suggests non-Latin scripts not having had "much printing press and typewriter use", so I don't think there's much scope for interpretation there. And in fact, the idea is inherently a condescending and colonialist one—of Western superiority over unsophisticated "those" people—even though it may well be held innocently and stated as such. But I do take the point about not responding to the person, and responding kindly to the idea instead. Will try harder, as I think I usually do.)
(BTW "reactionary" means something specific…)