Re:Why does science news suck so much?
by bawolff on Sunday June 19, 2022 @09:21AM
(#31799106)
I would say quanta magazine is a counterexample
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why does science news suck so much?
by jelliclesfarm on Sunday June 19, 2022 @12:43PM
(#31800937)
Also: Nautilus
Nautilus is actually an example that supports how in-depth science reporting can be difficult to monetize. I really like many of their articles in the publication, but there was a major incident a while back when they were severely (many months, even longer than a year) behind on paying their writers.
I actually happened to meet a writer who had this happen to them, but this incident was also publicized in an open letter (source: https://nwu.org/an-open-letter-from-freelancers-at-nautilus-..., with discussion about this on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/aznfusion/status/941051077922869248). This happened in 2017, and I'm not sure how long it took to get resolved.
Re:Why does science news suck so much?
by jelliclesfarm on Sunday June 19, 2022 @06:57PM
(#31804333)
That’s very sad. There is go fund me and crows funding for all kinds of weird causes and 50k isn’t such a huge amount either.
The future seems bleak.
ETA: Oh!! The link re: the Twitter thread is gnarly! I hope this got resolved and the freelancers got something out of this.
Re:Why does science news suck so much?
by spaetzleesser on Sunday June 19, 2022 @09:41AM
(#31799292)
How do they finance themselves?