News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Would 1950s Living Standards Save Us? by mdp2021 on Friday June 17, 2022 @06:44PM (#31785408)
Simply that "proper solutions are feasible; silver bullets not really"; that the problems are not really about "what to do", but "how to do it".

"Problem: overpopulation. Proposal: colonizing Mars". Putting the latter on the table was not the real difficulty.

The difficulty is in drawing a feasible plan for an implementation, to promote a proposal into a solution.

Re:Would 1950s Living Standards Save Us? by dredmorbius on Friday June 17, 2022 @07:17PM (#31785703)
What specifically might you see as requisite preconditions / operations for reducing US military spending?
Re:Would 1950s Living Standards Save Us? by mdp2021 on Friday June 17, 2022 @08:13PM (#31786118)
?! Apart from the replacement of the current regimes configuration worldwide with a stable coordinated alliance, wiping the current *brink* and redrawing a reassuring image over it? How was that remotely proposable given the chessboard outside the window? Europe is rearming!!!

Last piece of news I got from the papers only minutes ago was Cuba and Urals having met to proclaim their will for a multipolar world - is not the present time clear enough?

Was my previous post not clear? Proposals have to be credible! Anybody can come up with a proposal which is not a solution. It is what so-called "populism" does for a living, to spread "enthusiastic, (pseudo)heartly" ideas. There is no value in "they shall eat cake": you have to point to where the flour and eggs are!

Re:Would 1950s Living Standards Save Us? by dredmorbius on Friday June 17, 2022 @08:15PM (#31786135)
Thanks, that's clearer.

You're a bit telegraphic in what you write. You might want to offer a bit more to your audience. Your viewpoint deserves it.