Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future
by nine_k on Thursday June 16, 2022 @06:40PM
(#31771898)
Alternative chemisitries are many, and are actively developed; here's a 2021 overview: https://www.mining.com/non-lithium-battery-chemistries-to-gr...
What I can't predict is when some of them will become competitive enough to matter, and thus used in some large infrastructure projects.
Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future
by adrianN on Friday June 17, 2022 @05:09AM
(#31775787)
If we had completely free, 100% efficient grid scale storage of unlimited capacity today we couldn't stop burning fossil fuels because we don't have enough renewable generation capacity installed to fill any form of storage.
Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future
by belorn on Monday June 20, 2022 @04:15AM
(#31807623)
If the storage solution is close to free then the capacity doesn't matter since any new investment would be guarantied profit. Wind, when the weather is optimal, is several time cheaper than fossil fuels. Everyone would rush to just install new renewable capacity.
Just this week in Europe, during the summer vacations and when energy usage is at the lowest point during the year, the energy market price still jumps by 3000% when the wind go from high to low.
If you can do it by this winter it would solve inflation, enable a complete sanction packet against Russian oil and gas, solve several political conflicts within EU in regard to the Ukraine war, eliminate the food shortage problem and significant reduce the cost of farming, make a large dent in reducing global warming, improve GDP, and boost prosperity in general.