News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future by ncmncm on Thursday June 16, 2022 @02:42AM (#31763108)
Pumped hydro is far, far less geographically specific than always assumed.

This is partly because it needs no watershed, and partly because transmission lines mean it need not be local.

Anyway pumped hydro is only one of many equally viable alternatives. All will be used. Eventually which ones are cheapest will become clear.

Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future by sanderjd on Thursday June 16, 2022 @07:09PM (#31772119)
I think my assumption with pumped hydro is that there must be something holding it back because it's been mature for a long time, so if it were as useful and scalable as you say, I think it would have been scaled a lot more by now.
Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future by ncmncm on Friday June 17, 2022 @02:25AM (#31774718)
The overwhelming majority of utility-scale storage today is pumped hydro. It stores and releases many GWh every day. You don't hear much about it because it just works.
Re:Nuclear is back on the table for a green future by sanderjd on Saturday June 18, 2022 @05:36PM (#31794051)
Yes but is still a small amount of energy relative to total demand and there don't seem to be serious efforts to scale it up massively. I don't claim to know why there aren't. Maybe there should be. It just makes me suspicious when I see a mature technology that still sees limited deployment, that there is a good reason for that.