For several weeks it was almost impossible to escape the endless firehose of "news" from the Depp / Heard trial. I think it is a very clear example of this.
You think the trial was cooked up by the media so they could report on it? Like, the media convinced Heard to have that article written up in the first place?
I mean, assuming the whole thing wasn't made up (and I doubt it was), I think it's an instance where the news was more than just random celebrity gossip. That case touched on some important issues about domestic violence (especially against men) and freedom of speech which I think would have made it newsworthy enough on its own. From Depp's perspective at least, it was also important to have the case play out very publicly since he was trying to use it as an opportunity to clear his name.
That said, the media sure did exploit it for all it was worth. I'm still seeing articles about it and expect there will be plenty more.
No I'm not claiming anything is made up. And it certainly is newsworthy in that it should've spawned a couple articles here and there, and maybe a couple covering its conclusion. What we got instead was completely out of proportion for any journalistic measure of 'newsworthiness'.
Then we have a whole other category of "news" which has been fabricated out of whole cloth for the purpose of selling even more advertising to a vast demographic of people who are never, or very rarely going to sit down to read the Süddeutsche Zeitung, Globe and Mail, Los Angeles Times or similar on a daily basis.
I have a theory that the aggregate advertising revenue from the latter class of "news" is rapidly eclipsing the first type.