News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance by jmoak3 on Monday June 13, 2022 @12:21PM (#31727644)
>I'd say you have a more black-and-white vision than me.

I definitely do. If a part of bitcoin's chain of usage requires enough trust to ask the government to intervene to protect me, why not just trust the government?

>My suspicion was simply that many HNers tend to reflexively upvote any comment that paints crypto in a bad light.

I think that many people agree with me, and that it's not some reflex, fud, or deception.

Re:Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance by olalonde on Monday June 13, 2022 @12:35PM (#31727880)
> I definitely do. If a part of bitcoin's chain of usage requires enough trust to ask the government to intervene to protect me, why not just trust the government?

I am not sure I understand the question, Bitcoin does not require trust or intervention from the government.

Your original comment is objectively incorrect in two different ways. It's not even remotely a surprising event[0] and most importantly, self-custody does not require running a server. Therefore I maintain my suspicion but enjoy your upvotes.

[0] "You can't make this up": used to express great surprise. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/you-coul...

Re:Temporary pause of Bitcoin withdrawals on Binance by jmoak3 on Monday June 13, 2022 @04:17PM (#31731210)
>self-custody does not require running a server.

I disagree and have made my case elsewhere. Anymore and I think we'd be going in circles.

>You can't make this up": used to express great surprise.

I think I used it correctly, but agree to disagree on this as well.

Sorry for confusing your suspicions with something more conspiratorial.