Re:Lilium achieves first main wing transition for all-electr...
by bluejekyll on Sunday June 12, 2022 @12:27PM
(#31715733)
Any idea what the minimum height for the parachute to be effective as a life saving device?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Lilium achieves first main wing transition for all-electr...
by nradov on Sunday June 12, 2022 @12:56PM
(#31716020)
Minimum effective altitude for parachutes on light aircraft is about 400 ft agl, but the exact number varies depending on the flight regime. For powered lift aircraft there is likely a small "dead zone" in the flight envelope: too high to survive a crash, too low for the parachute to be effective. This may or may not be acceptable depending on mission risk tolerance and the reliability of other systems.
https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2018/march/flig...
Re:Lilium achieves first main wing transition for all-electr...
by GordonS on Sunday June 12, 2022 @01:54PM
(#31716616)
> too high to survive a crash, too low for the parachute to be effective
This is probably a silly question, but couldn't the pilot just wait until the plane dropped below the dead zone before deploying the parachute?
Re:Lilium achieves first main wing transition for all-electr...
by chipsa on Sunday June 12, 2022 @05:37PM
(#31718524)
You're thinking about the dead zone in the wrong way: There's a height X where you can drop the aircraft and it'll absorb all the forces to have the people live. There's a height Y where the parachute has enough time to deploy and bring the aircraft to terminal velocity. If X is less than Y, there's a height where there's nothing to save you.
Options to resolve this are: make X higher by making the structure able to absorb more energy, or make Y lower by having it deploy faster.
Re:Lilium achieves first main wing transition for all-electr...
by Andrew_nenakhov on Sunday June 12, 2022 @04:25PM
(#31717958)
The lower the craft drops, the deader the zone.