News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by chrisseaton on Saturday June 11, 2022 @05:40PM (#31708689)
> My (WAG) guess

Wives-and-girlfriends?

Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by matheist on Saturday June 11, 2022 @05:47PM (#31708772)
Wild-ass guess
Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by chrisseaton on Saturday June 11, 2022 @05:49PM (#31708785)
Wild-ass guess guess?
Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by fragmede on Saturday June 11, 2022 @06:04PM (#31708900)
Yes, like when people say PIN number or ATM machine. Or HIV virus or LCD display.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAS_syndrome

Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by tsimionescu on Sunday June 12, 2022 @01:16AM (#31711650)
Honestly I don't think these are as often wrong as some people think. While PIN and ATM work well even when articulated (please input the PIN, the ATM is broken), others don't ("the HIV has killed millions"). LCD is more on the fence for me.

Other common examples that don't sound that wrong to me are "the IP/TCP/... protocol".

For a different reason, I also don't think "this API expects a JWT token" is redundant: JWT is the name of a standard, so the phrase should be parsed as "the API expects a token in JSON Web Token format".

Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by seanhunter on Sunday June 12, 2022 @03:33AM (#31712424)
Or, as recently, PUBG Battlegrounds, which reuses 2 letters from the ititialism.
Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by kzrdude on Saturday June 11, 2022 @07:42PM (#31709595)
Are there iterated versions of that?
Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by gboone on Saturday June 11, 2022 @10:35PM (#31710742)
SSD drive
Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by willismichael on Saturday June 11, 2022 @09:50PM (#31710482)
JWT token
Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by tsimionescu on Sunday June 12, 2022 @01:19AM (#31711660)
This is not a good example - JWT is the name of a format, not of the token stored in that format. JWT token just means "token in JWT format".

Saying "a JWT" is in fact more dubious, like saying "an SQL" instead of "an SQL string".

Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by Someone on Sunday June 12, 2022 @02:14AM (#31711962)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519 disagrees:

Abstract

JSON Web Token (JWT) is a compact, URL-safe means of representing claims to be transferred between two parties. The claims in a JWT are encoded as a JSON object that is used as the payload of a JSON Web Signature (JWS) structure or as the plaintext of a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) structure, enabling the claims to be digitally signed or integrity protected with a Message Authentication Code (MAC) and/or encrypted.

Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by tsimionescu on Sunday June 12, 2022 @06:40AM (#31713482)
Even the quoted fragment is a bit debatable - while the standard does commonly use "JWT" to mean a particular token, the very first sentence is only grammatical if we take JWT to be the name of the standard/format. Otherwise, it's missing an article - it should have been "*A* JSON Web Token (JWT) is [...]" if it were consistently used to refer to individual tokens, not the collective format.
Re:US moves closer to recalling Tesla’s self-driving software by chrisseaton on Monday June 13, 2022 @09:00AM (#31724920)
> like saying "an SQL"

An SQL is an implementation of the System Query Language isn’t it? Like MySQL, or MSSQL.