News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In defense of cryptocurrency by mywaifuismeta on Friday June 10, 2022 @05:12AM (#31691757)
That's how you end up with Google, Apple, and Facebook, Twitter, etc. They may start out as providing a service that works, but over time as they get bigger the incentive structure pushes them towards monetizing your data, locking you in, building boundaries around who can access what (e.g.Twitter APIs), and sharing data with parties you don't want to share it with.

One way to avoid this lock-in is to change the underlying incentive structure. That's what the blockchain does. The fundamental difference is not about centralized vs. decentralized, it's about the incentives that are a result of centralization vs decentralization.

Re:In defense of cryptocurrency by nicoburns on Friday June 10, 2022 @05:36AM (#31691895)
The other way of changing the underlying incentive structure is have the centralised service provided publicly by a government rather than privately by a corporation. That's what traditional currencies do, and there's no reason that this model couldn't work for digitalised currencies too.
Re:In defense of cryptocurrency by danuker on Friday June 10, 2022 @06:13AM (#31692092)
And which government has not abused its power? Fiat currency is a prime example.