Less parking could mean more housing

Re:Less parking could mean more housing by throwaway0a5e on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @05:21PM (#31674405)

I'm fine with this but be aware that the catch here is that if you aren't moving dollars around you can't attach strings to those dollars. Controlling funding by gatekeeping it with specific requirements for eligibility is a large part of how the feds control the states and the states control municipalities.

If you don't fund their roads you can't tell them "but you need a sidewalk".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Less parking could mean more housing by ratata on Thursday June 09, 2022 @01:02AM (#31677724)

>If you don't fund their roads you can't tell them "but you need a sidewalk".

The Americans with Disabilities Act says you need sidewalks.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Less parking could mean more housing by throwaway0a5e on Thursday June 09, 2022 @06:24AM (#31679497)

And that's exactly why I cited it.

What's the enforcement mechanism if the entity writing the rules doesn't control the purse strings? Tie them up in court for 10yr and then when you finally win they just do something marginally different to the same end (i.e. exactly what we see with civil liberties).

[ Parent | on HN ]