News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by DAlperin on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @03:53PM (#31673077)
Having been in public school for most of my life I can say unequivocally: yes. It is not uncommon for teachers to purchase books and classroom supplies out of pocket since there simply is not enough funding.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by havblue on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @04:04PM (#31673238)
Most estimates I've seen of funding for New York students is $25k to $30k a year though. I would think that's more of a sign of incredible corruption and mismanagement and not that there isn't enough money to go around.

To compare, Stuyvesant High School, the best in NYC, is $18k per student.

Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by DAlperin on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @05:45PM (#31674730)
I would argue the point that Stuyvesant is the "best" but I don't disagree with your point. The problem is that a lot of the money ends up in the schools with the rich kids and for a lot a lot of students and schools they never see anywhere near that type of money.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by wan23 on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @05:55PM (#31674853)
Stuyvesant, like most good schools, raises a good deal of private funds. That actually accounts for good deal of the difference in resources between schools.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by kbelder on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @04:48PM (#31673862)
I think it's a combination. School districts are funded exceedingly well in our country. School classrooms are funded poorly.

The money evaporates before it reaches them.