Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by havblue on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @03:30PM
(#31672773)
Do you think public schools are underfunded? Any chart I've seen has shown the opposite, if you compare our schools to other countries'.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by DAlperin on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @03:53PM
(#31673077)
Having been in public school for most of my life I can say unequivocally: yes. It is not uncommon for teachers to purchase books and classroom supplies out of pocket since there simply is not enough funding.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by havblue on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @04:04PM
(#31673238)
Most estimates I've seen of funding for New York students is $25k to $30k a year though. I would think that's more of a sign of incredible corruption and mismanagement and not that there isn't enough money to go around.
To compare, Stuyvesant High School, the best in NYC, is $18k per student.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by DAlperin on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @05:45PM
(#31674730)
I would argue the point that Stuyvesant is the "best" but I don't disagree with your point. The problem is that a lot of the money ends up in the schools with the rich kids and for a lot a lot of students and schools they never see anywhere near that type of money.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by wan23 on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @05:55PM
(#31674853)
Stuyvesant, like most good schools, raises a good deal of private funds. That actually accounts for good deal of the difference in resources between schools.