News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by UncleMeat on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @02:11PM (#31671695)
I think it depends on what the rules are. A lot of rules encode social and class norms rather than actually achieve a pedagogical goal. Classic examples of this is forcing kids to use "proper" grammar rather than AAVE or forcing left-handed kids to write with the right hand.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by mmmpop on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @08:46PM (#31676351)
I take your point but I had awful redneck grammar until I was 22 or so, and it's something everyone can fix if they just put the time in. I'm not a stickler for "correct" words because language evolves, but if you come to HN because you like programming, surely you'd understand why I'd appreciate semantics of grammar.

But forcing a child to use their non-dominant right hand could be considered a form of cruelty I suppose, so not seeing how they're really related.

When I go back home to Appalachia, I fall back into my old bad habits readily but if I got a call from my boss, I'm switching to "educated" and that's more than just ditching the drawl, it's modifying the entire way I structure my thoughts. I think that's very common and not unfair to expect from someone claiming that they desire education.

Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu... by UncleMeat on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @10:27PM (#31676975)
What you describe here is often called "code switching" and it requires nontrivial mental effort. The folks that don't need to code switch (because work culture matches their dominant culture norms) are at an advantage.