Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by luxuryballs on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @02:04PM
(#31671590)
This is where I think things are kind to vary wildly between different regions and districts so we have to be specific make sure we are comparing apples to apples. A gift program like you describe “by name only” isn’t a gifted program at all, that doesn’t mean “real” ones don’t exist. It’s like saying the funding for baseballs is not producing any baseball players meanwhile they only use the baseballs for playing tennis.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by DAlperin on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @02:55PM
(#31672284)
Sure but the issues faced here in New York are not unique, just particularly visible due to the size. The systemically racist systems exist everywhere and I would be willing to bet money that in the majority of districts and regions where gifted programs exist will have absurdly low percentages of brown and black students. And again, that is not because brown and black students aren't as smart. The systems of this country deals them a bad hand before they even know they're playing the game in the first place.
Re:The case for expanding rather than eliminating gifted edu...
by s1artibartfast on Wednesday June 08, 2022 @04:50PM
(#31673910)
How do you feel about gifted programs in school districts where black and brown student largely don't exist?
OR for that matter, how about the inverse?